Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0957

reference
319-tree-1
name
0957
tree-preservation-order

undefined

319-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027125 50.866945)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027040 50.866936,-1.027044 50.866953,-1.027056 50.866968,-1.027074 50.866980,-1.027098 50.866988,-1.027124 50.866991,-1.027151 50.866989,-1.027175 50.866981,-1.027194 50.866969,-1.027206 50.866954,-1.027211 50.866938,-1.027207 50.866921,-1.027195 50.866906,-1.027176 50.866894,-1.027153 50.866886,-1.027127 50.866883,-1.027100 50.866886,-1.027076 50.866893,-1.027057 50.866905,-1.027045 50.866920,-1.027040 50.866936)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL